Tuesday, January 31, 2006

NY Senate Candidate-Ch. 13

There are two candidates running Democratics in opposition to incumbent Senator Hillary Clinton. They are both running on an anti-war platform and are strongly supportive of and advocates for social issues such as Expanded Medicare For All , A Living Wage, Environmental Issues etc. These 1 hour videos are an introduction to them and their campaign. We hope you will view these and then attend meetings which will be held in the future when they come to town.

Copies of the videos are also available at the Tompkins County Health Care Task Force Office - in the Living Wage space above Autumn Leaves.

Candidate Jonathan Tasini Wednesday Feb. 8th 1:30 p.m.

Thursday Feb. 9th 10:00 p.m.

Friday Feb. 10th 9:00 a.m.

Candidate Steve Greenfield Wednesday Feb. 15th 1:30 p.m.

Thursday Feb. 16th 10:00 p.m.

Friday Feb. 17th 9:00 a.m.

For more information email or call Rebecca Elgie 272-0621

Monday, January 30, 2006

DSA Presents: Women's Work

Ithaca Democratic Socialists of America Presents #238:

"Women's Work" Kathy Luz Herrera, an electrician and member of the
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 241, talks
about the work that women usually do and how she decided to enter a
less typical line of work.

Tuesday, January 31 7:00-7:30 pm on Channel 13
Wednesday, February 1 1:00-1:30 pm on Channel 13
Thursday, February 2 11:00-11:30 pm on Channel 13

This video is available in the Alternatives Library in Anabel Taylor
Hall on Cornell Campus.

If you would like to help out with our community access cable television
series, call Theresa Alt at 273-3009 or email talt@igc.org.

--
Theresa Alt
talt@igc.org

Sunday, January 29, 2006

The Filibuster: Your Sunday Inspiration

Dear Friends:

The filibuster movement has heated up considerably over the weekend. We have had several senators come on board, and with continued pressure today, we expect many others to join. For a complete up-date on how things are falling out (and keep in mind many names NOT on this list have announced they will decide later), see this diary, which is updated throughout the day:

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/1/28/1420/46748

(This site is the busiest it has ever been, so it may take a few minutes to load.)

The media, of course, is in full swing to paint those of us working tirelessly this weekend as "radical internet leftists." In fact, Rove has even seized upon this to suggest that the Democratic party is reaching for the center and the liberal blogosphere is pulling it apart. Unfortunately, many people in Democratic leadership positions believe this. Fortunately, Harry Reid does not. It remains to be seen if he will rise to real leadership and get his aprty in line, or continue to allow those who resist the filibuster but will vote no on Alito (assuring him confirmation -- a meaningless NO vote) to entertain the fantasy that rolling over yet again to the Bush White House is how a good Democrat behaves.

There is a truly WONDERFUL diary about just how successful our "keeping our powder dry" has been on Dailykos. Here is the link. Read it for a real wake-up call to just how ineffective we have been as an opposition:

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/1/28/22466/2047

As for me, I found this quote by Abraham Lincoln to be most inspiring, and I offer it to you this Sunday morning with the hopes that it will give you the prod you need to keep your eyes on the prize of a defeated Alito nomination and the birth of a real opposition:

"Neither let us be slandered from our duty by false accusations against us, nor frightened from it by menaces of destruction to the Government nor of dungeons to ourselves. LET US HAVE FAITH THAT RIGHT MAKES MIGHT, AND IN THAT FAITH, LET US, TO THE END, DARE TO DO OUR DUTY AS WE UNDERSTAND IT."

Those of us who have taken up this fight for a filibuster are fully aware of the fact that we may lose. But how can we ever expect the voting populace to regard us as a party that will stand for them if we only choose those battles we can look good fighting, and which we know we have certainty of winning?

I hope you will join me, and millions of other people across the United States, in coming forward in the next twenty four hours and demanding that we stand up to this grave threat to our republic. We may lose. But it is the right thing to do. This is, as they say, a good hill to die on.

If you have not yet sent your letters, faxes or e-mails, and need to know how, please e-mail me at jml16@cornell.edu and I will see that you get the lists and numbers.

posted by Jane Marie Law

Friday, January 27, 2006

Tompkins County Democratic Committee Passes Resolution in Support of Filibuster

On Thursday evening, the Tompkins County Democratic Committee passed a resolution urging Senators Clinton and Schumer to support the filibuster of Samuel Alito's confirmation to the Supreme Court.

The resolution and statement of the fact that it was passed (with only one negative vote and one abstention, and all the rest, around 80, in favor) will be put on committee letterhead and sent to Schumer and Clinton's office by Friday.

The resolution was made by Martha Robertson, and seconded by Marty Luster and Jane Marie Law, and passed with a near unanimous vote.

Because the by-laws of the TCDC require that all resolutions be presented in advance, a resolution to suspend the rules to make introduction and passage of this resoltuion possible was held prior to the resolution being voted upon.

Tuesday, January 24, 2006

*please forward* YDS Conference (FEB 17-19, NYC)

** help spread the word to youth/students **

TURNING THE TIDE TOWARDS FREEDOM:
Building the Youth and Student Movement for Justice
February 17-19, 2006 - New York City
[PDF conference flyer] print & distribute to publicize locally


The Young Democratic Socialists (YDS) are hosting a national conference in New York City on February 17-19 (President's Day vacation weekend), called "Turning the Tide Towards Freedom: Building the Youth and Student Movement for Justice" to bring together activists from across the country for workshops, trainings, great speakers, and more to reenergize the struggle to build a better future! 

REGISTER TODAY / MORE INFO HERE:
WWW.YDSUSA.ORG
 

FEATURED SPEAKERS INCLUDE:        

  • Bill Fletcher Jr. - President of TransAfrica Forum, founder of the Black Radical Congress, former Education Director of the AFL-CIO;
  • Frances Fox Piven - Distinguished sociologist at the CUNY Graduate Center, author of The War at Home: The Domestic Costs of Bush's Militarism, Poor People's Movements, and The New Class War, and Honorary Chair of the Democratic Socialists of America;
  • Christian Parenti - The Nation correspondent, author of The Freedom: Shadows and Hallucinations in Occupied Iraq, The Soft Cage: Surveillance in America from Slavery to the War on Terror and Lockdown America: Police and Prisons in the Age of Crisis;
  • Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak - Director of the Center for Comparative Literature and Society at Columbia University, author of Can the Subaltern Speak?, noted post-colonial theorist, and longtime activist in the international women's movement;
  • Marilyn Clement - Head of the Campaign For A National Healthcare Program Now!, formerly the Executive Director of the Center for Constitutional Rights and The Women's International League for Peace and Freedom;
  • Steve Max - Former leader of Students for a Democratic Society (SDS), Midwest Academy trainer;
  • Adrienne Maree Brown - Director of Communications at the League of Young Voters;
  • Damu Smith - Co-chair of Black Voices for Peace, executive director of the National Black Environmental Justice Network;
  • Stephen Eric Bronner - Author of Blood in the Sand: Imperial Fantasies, Right-Wing Ambitions & the Erosion of American Democracy;
  • Joseph Schwartz - Chair, Department of Political Science at Temple University, author of The Future of Democratic Equality.
FULL SPEAKER LIST AVAILABLE ON WEBSITE:  WWW.YDSUSA.ORG
People come to YDS conferences from all over the country.  If you are coming from out of town, it is important to plan your trip as early as possible. Check out the conference website for tips on fundraising and getting to NYC.
Travel scholarships and housing assistance available.  Go on-line for details.
Please contact us if you wish to donate to the scholarship fund for low-income youth to attend the conference.

Elizabeth Rothschild, Organizer
Young Democratic Socialists
198 Broadway, Suite 700
New York, NY 10038
212-727-8610 ext. 24
www.ydsusa.org
Liberty! Equality! Solidarity!

--  
Theresa Alt
talt@igc.org

Monday, January 23, 2006

DSA Presents: Children of Iraq

Ithaca Democratic Socialists of America Presents #237:

"Children of Iraq" Kathy Kelly of Voices in the Wilderness addresses
Ithaca peace activists about her experiences in Iraq going back to
the first Gulf War.

Tuesday, January 24 7:00-7:30 pm on Channel 13
Wednesday, January 25 1:00-1:30 pm on Channel 13
Thursday, January 26 11:00-11:30 pm on Channel 13

This video will be available in about a day in the Alternatives
Library in Anabel Taylor Hall on Cornell Campus.

If you would like to help out with our community access cable television
series, call Theresa Alt at 273-3009 or email talt@igc.org.

--
Theresa Alt
talt@igc.org

Sunday, January 22, 2006

Fw: Granny D's 96th

-----Forwarded Message-----
>From: Dennis Burke <support@newenglandreformschool.org>
>Sent: Jan 21, 2006 5:51 PM
>To: erelgie@earthlink.net
>Subject: Granny D's 96th
>
>Dear Friends,
>
>January 24th, this coming week, is Doris "Granny D" Haddock's 96th birthday. She will spend it in travel, returning from a speech in Wisconsin to support their effort to enact the public financing of campaigns--a key issue in this Abramoff age.
>
>On Saturday, February 4th, she will speak in Washington, D.C. at a counter-State of the Union rally, 11 a.m. at 17th and Constitution.
>
>The latest move of the Bush junta to make us cower in fear is their sweeping up of all web search engine data. Will that work? I think it will instead make millions more Americans understand that this Administration must go. As for speaking out, there are still fearless people among us, and one of them is Doris.
>
>Birthday idea: Please take a look at her project to get some street action going: http://TARandFEATHERS.org and, after you read it, send it along to your lists and to the orgs you belong to. Second idea--and I will lead the way with a contribution of my own--let's keep her on the road speaking out with small donations--no one is paying her way to DC, for instance, and she lives on Social Security. Checks should be payable to Doris Haddock and sent to her at P.O. Box 492, Dublin, New Hampshire 03444. Those envelopes will be great fun for her to open next week!
>
>Sincerely,
>
>Dennis Burke
>volunteer in Phoenix, AZ
>
>Ps. Bob Ney, U.S. Rep from Ohio, has been in the news for his ties to Abramoff. He was one of the guys who threatened to filibuster the McCain-Feingold bill in the U.S. House (where it was called the Shays-Meehan bill). Doris said, if he likes filibusters I will show him one, and she went into his office on Capitol Hill and stood her ground at a little podium, reading the endless list of his special-interest donors. She expected to be arrested of course, but Ney's chief of staff (who later went to work for Abramoff and is now also in hot water) was smarter than that and called Republican, Chris Shays, to ask her to stop. She wouldn't go against Mrs. Shays, so she ended her filibuster, but it was all over the newspapers on the Hill, and the filibuster was never attempted. The bill passed the next night.
>
>A year earlier, when the measure was about to be debated in the Senate, Ney and his gang had come to Arizona and rented the city council chamber to put on a little circus of a U.S. House hearing, trying to show a C-Span audience that McCain had no support for soft money reforms even in his own state. We were in DC protesting, but Doris said, "you better run home." I got on the speakers list, somewhat under false pretenses, and had a fine time blasting Ney, Doolittle and others for their corrupting contributions. The hearing played on C-Span several times on the first day of Senate debate, so I would say Doris got the better of Ney twice.
>
>I have also been reminded in recent days of a protest speech Doris made on the west steps fo the Capitol, after which she led a group of law students to the front door of the Justice Department, upon which they pasted a copy of the federal bribery statute. I'm glad they are finally reading that fine law. --db
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>NewEnglandReformSchool.org
>http://newenglandreformschool.org
>Cobb Meadow Road
>Dublin, NH 03444
>USA
>
>
>If you do not wish to receive this message please remove erelgie@earthlink.net:
>http://www.rttr3.com/eis-cgi-bin/u?c=3938,3903&e=erelgie@earthlink.net
>
>Powered by Relevant Tools.
>If you have any problems with this message please see:
>http://www.rttr3.com/contact_email.html

Monday, January 16, 2006

DSA Presents: Car Sharing

Ithaca Democratic Socialists of America Presents #236:

"Car Sharing" Farah Hussain interviews Fernando de Aragon, Director
of the Ithaca - Tompkins County Transportation Council, about car
sharing, a way for more people to take advantage of fewer cars. There
will be a panel discussion on the idea on Thursday, Jan. 25, 2006 in
101 Phillips Hall, Engineering Quad, Cornell.

Tuesday, January 17 7:00-7:30 pm on Channel 13
Wednesday, January 18 1:00-1:30 pm on Channel 13
Thursday, January 19 11:00-11:30 pm on Channel 13

This video will be available soon in the Alternatives Library in
Anabel Taylor Hall on Cornell Campus.

If you would like to help out with our community access cable television
series, call Theresa Alt at 273-3009 or email talt@igc.org.

--
Theresa Alt
talt@igc.org

Steve Greenfield-Senate Candidate - Ithaca-1/21/06


STEVE GREENFIELD WHO HAS ANNOUNCED HIS CANDIDACY FOR SENATE AGAINST SENATOR HILLARY CLINTON WILL BE SPEAKING IN ITHACA THIS SATURDAY.

SATURDAY, JANUARY 21, 4:00-6:00 P.M.

LIVING WAGE SPACE ABOVE AUTUMN LEAVES

JOIN US TO HEAR STEVE'S VIEWS AND ASK QUESTIONS.

January 13th, 2006
Contact: Greenfield for Senate (www.greenfieldforsenate.org)
Steve Greenfield (845) 532-0280, greenfieldforsenate@earthlink.net

"Time's up, Senator Clinton." -- Steve Greenfield, NY Democratic Party candidate for United States Senate

On November 29th, 2005, Senator Hillary Clinton, facing mounting criticism from the anti-war movement and an unexpected and widely reported challenge in her own party's 2006 primary from anti-war activist Steve Greenfield, released a 1,600 word document standing by her pro-Iraq War voting record and outlining, for the first time, what developments she would look for before examining the question of US troop withdrawal. She said, in part:

"Like all Americans, I hope the Iraqi elections are a true expression of democracy, one that is committed to majority rule, minority rights, women's rights, and the basic rule of law. I hope these elections will finally put the Iraqi people on the road to real security and independence. If these elections succeed, we should be able to start drawing down our troops, but we should also plan to continue to help secure the country and the region with a smaller footprint on an as-needed basis."

The elections have come and gone. In their aftermath, there have been widespread charges of fraud, a delegitimization of Iraqi
self-governance, high-ranking Iraqi resignations, and one of the largest single-week escalations of deadly violence against both Iraqi authorities and United States troops since the onset of the invasion nearly three years ago.

Steve Greenfield, challenger for the Democratic Party nomination for US Senate in 2006, says "Time's up."

"We've heard this story over and over again. The anti-war movement argued from the beginning that the American occupation was the inspiration, rather than the cure, for the escalating Iraqi resistance. But Hillary Clinton, and the administration and congressional hawks with whom she has allied herself, denounced this obvious truth and spun their support for the war in new ways. First we were told the violence would end after the Coalition Provisional Authority set up civil institutions to replace direct Pentagon control. Then we heard the violence would end with the deaths of Saddam's sons. Then we heard the violence would end with the arrests of key figures in the ludicrous "deck of cards" of Baathist officials, culminating with the capture of Saddam himself. More recently we heard that the adoption of the new Iraqi Constitution, backed by an escalation in US troops, would weaken the rebellion, and ultimately, as Hillary Clinton asserted, that the new elections would calm the violence and empower Iraq's own civil authorities, police, and armed forces to quell any remaining resistance on their own. No reasonable person bought into this fool's paradise."

"Time's up, Senator" Greenfield continued. "The last item on your timeline of excuses has expired. United States forces have suffered one of the deadliest weeks since the war began. Hundreds more Iraqis have been killed. Hundreds more American families have been left widowed, orphaned, childless, or caring for invalid loved ones. When will you see that enough is enough, and move to swiftly bring our troops home from this deepening quicksand? How many more must die? How many more must be maimed and paralyzed? How much more debt must our children incur, and what legacy of violence must they inherit? When will you admit your error in supporting and sustaining this illegal invasion, and bring legislation to end the war?"

Greenfield called on all New Yorkers, regardless of where they stood at the time hostilities were initiated, to contact their pro-war Senators Clinton and Schumer immediately and demand an end to US involvement in Iraq. "Let them know that democracy starts at home. Tell them that if they believe, as we do, that our nation's government is by the people, for the people, and of the people, that the people of New York want our people brought home to safety, and we want it done now, as quickly as the safety of the troops themselves will allow."

For further information, contact greenfieldforsenate@earthlink.net or call (845) 532-0280 and visit www.greenfieldforsenate.org.

Thursday, January 12, 2006

DSA Presents: The Threat of Depleted Uranium - [again]

Ithaca Democratic Socialists of America Presents #235:

"The Threat of Depleted Uranium" Thomas Fasy talks with Mary Ann Grady Flores.

Tuesday, January 10 7:00-7:30 pm on Channel 13
Wednesday, January 11 1:00-1:30 pm on Channel 13
Thursday, January 12 11:00-11:30 pm on Channel 13

We tried to run this show last week, but first it failed to air by
mistake, and then there were technical problems, so it's running
again this week for all who couldn't get it last time.

This video will be available soon in the Alternatives Library in
Anabel Taylor Hall on Cornell Campus.

If you would like to help out with our community access cable television
series, call Theresa Alt at 273-3009 or email talt@igc.org.

--
Theresa Alt
talt@igc.org

Thursday, January 05, 2006

Paul Loeb on Alito Nomination

ALITO’S EXTRAORDINARY CIRCUMSTANCES

By Paul Rogat Loeb

Remember the "nuclear option" compromise? When the group of 14 Senators reached their agreement last May, they said they'd support a filibuster only under "extraordinary circumstances," presumably if Bush nominated Attila the Hun. I'd suggest these circumstances apply not only to Samuel Alito's track record but also to his nomination's entire political context.

In threatening to end the Senate's ability to filibuster judges, Republican leaders talk much about high principle, the right of Presidents to have their nominees accepted or rejected without parliamentary obstructions. But the sole principle behind this proposed change is that of the power grab. The Republicans control the White House and Senate. They're attempting to consolidate control in every way they can, including trying to obliterate 200 years of Senate tradition on the filibuster. This threat isn't a moral stand: Republicans have filibustered nominees themselves. It's just one more in series of attacks on individuals and institutions that they've viewed as political obstacles, like Tom DeLay's mid-census gerrymandering, the leaking of Valerie Plame's identity, the jamming of Democratic phone banks, and the branding of political opponents as unpatriotic. Honorable conservatives used to warn against the raw power of the state. But the love of power has now become the political right's prime gospel, making the slightest notion of checks or balances heretical treason. Republican leaders work to end the filibuster not because they believe it violates some deep constitutional mandate, but because they believe they can get away with it.

But maybe they can't anymore. When Republicans first floated the "nuclear option" threat in early 2005, Bush's polling numbers were as high as 57 percent. His support has dropped steadily since, in the wake of the Katrina disaster, the legal problems of DeLay, Bill Frist, Karl Rove, Scooter Libby, and Duke Cunningham, and an Iraqi quagmire that's inspired powerful challenges by Cindy Sheehan and Congressman John Murtha. Republicans have lost key electoral battles in Virginia, New Jersey and California. Bush's polls have dropped as low as 37 percent. With once-solid Republican Senate and House seats now seemingly vulnerable, those who vote to eliminate the filibuster and confirm Alito will be taking far more of a political risk than they would have just a year ago.

Were Alito a reasonable Supreme Court choice, all this would be moot. But he isn't. He'll follow the script and evade specifics at his confirmation hearings, but he's still the candidate nominated to appease the political right because they deemed Harriet Miers insufficiently hard-line. Consistently opposing the federal government's right to address corporate abuses, Alito has argued for virtually unlimited executive power, including the government's right to intervene in the most intimate realms of personal life. He's endorsed the rights of police to shoot an unarmed 15-year-old who was fleeing after breaking into a house, defended the refusal of state employers to pay damages for violating the Family and Medical Leave Act, and said it created no undue burden if husbands could prevent their wives from getting abortions. Citizen groups, he's ruled, have no standing to sue convicted polluters under the Clean Water Act. The federal government, he's argued, has no right to pass national consumer protection legislation aimed at preventing odometer fraud or banning the sales of machine guns. Regarding the exclusion of blacks from juries in death penalty cases, he's called the statistical evidence as inconsequential as the disproportionate number of recent U.S. presidents who've been left-handed. In one case, Alito's Third Circuit colleagues said the federal law prohibiting employment discrimination "would be eviscerated if our analysis were to halt where [Judge Alito] suggests."

Alito now downplays his membership in a Princeton alumni group so hostile to the admission of women and minorities that even Senate Majority Leader Frist condemned it. He dismisses as mere job-seeking his declarations, while applying to the Reagan-era Justice Department, that the Constitution does not protect a woman's right to choose an abortion, and that he disagreed with the Warren Court rulings that desegregated schools and expanded voting rights. He's trying to dismiss he memo he wrote, after getting the job, embracing the "goals of bringing about the eventual overturning of Roe v. Wade." He also minimizes the breaking of his pledge to recuse himself from cases involving his sister's law firm.

It's precisely because Alito's presence on the Court is so potentially damaging that Democrats and moderate Republicans have a responsibility to challenge his nomination through every possible mechanism, including the filibuster. Republican leaders who try to eliminate it as a political option need to be branded, along with every Senator who supports them, as embodying a politics that believes in nothing except its own right to power. With Roberts, Senators could say they were replacing the equally conservative William Rehnquist. To support Alito, we need to make clear, is to alter the balance on the Court radically for the most dubious of political ends. It does no good to reserve the right to filibuster in theory. If our Senators aren't willing to risk using it in a situation this exceptional, it becomes practically meaningless.

Senators accept a president's court nominations for three reasons: They respect the perspectives of their nominees; they believe a president should have the right to choose whomever they please as America's legitimately elected leader; or they fear the president's political power. But this administration has no moral standing to which Senators should automatically defer. Bush gained the presidency through the extraordinary interventions of his brother Jeb and the existing Supreme Court. He was reelected based on lies about Iraqi weapons of mass destruction, ties between Saddam Hussein and Al Qaida, John Kerry's war record, and the true costs of his tax cut and prescription drug plans. And through Ohio Secretary of State Ken Blackwell's elimination of 300,000 overwhelmingly Democratic voters from the Ohio rolls and the withholding of voting machines from key Democratic precincts. My friend Egil Krogh, who worked in the Nixon administration, hired G. Gordon Liddy, and went to prison for Watergate, told the sentencing judge that he and his colleagues had "almost destroyed democracy." The Bush people, he said to me recently, "are even more ruthless."

Alito's nomination embodies that ruthlessness. If confirmed, his track record suggests he'd support the Republican consolidation of power at every opportunity. But maybe the capacity of that power to intimidate is finally beginning to wane. If the Senate can find the courage to block Alito's confirmation, they will draw a critical line on a choice whose effects could echo for the next forty years. They need to recognize the high stakes and extraordinary circumstances of our time.

Paul Rogat Loeb is the author of The Impossible Will Take a Little While: A Citizen's Guide to Hope in a Time of Fear, named the #3 political book of 2004 by the History Channel and the American Book Association, and winner of the Nautilus Award for best social change book of the year. His previous books include Soul of a Citizen: Living With Conviction in a Cynical Time. See www.paulloeb.org To receive his monthly articles email sympa@onenw.org with the subject line: subscribe paulloeb-articles

Monday, January 02, 2006

DSA Presents: The Threat of Depleted Uranium

Ithaca Democratic Socialists of America Presents #235:

"The Threat of Depleted Uranium" Thomas Fasy talks with Mary Ann Grady Flores.

Tuesday, January 3 7:00-7:30 pm on Channel 13
Wednesday, January 4 1:00-1:30 pm on Channel 13
Thursday, January 5 11:00-11:30 pm on Channel 13

This video will be available soon in the Alternatives Library in
Anabel Taylor Hall on Cornell Campus.

If you would like to help out with our community access cable television
series, call Theresa Alt at 273-3009 or email talt@igc.org.

--
Theresa Alt
talt@igc.org